Abstract

Study This aiming For analyze about consequence law from deed a notary who does not explain the existence of a renvoi to the parties after signing the minutes of the deed and to analyze the legal responsibility of a notary who does not explain the existence of a renvoi to the parties the parties after the minutes of the deed are signed. The type of research used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials uses literature studies and analysis of legal materials is analyzed deductively Which done with interesting problem nature general to concrete problems. Based on the research results, it is known that First, the legal consequences of the deed notary who did not explain the existence of Renvoi to for parties after signing the minutes of the deed causes the deed to lose its power as an authentic deed, and is only considered to have the power as a private deed and secondly, the legal responsibility of a notary who does not explain the existence of a Renvoi to the parties after the minutes of the deed are signed. can held accountable law that is with give sanctions in the form of civil sanctions with demands for compensation and interest to the notary and administrative sanctions can charged in the form of reprimand oral, reprimand written, And temporary suspension.