International Journal of Judicial Law  |  ISSN: 2583-6536  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:5/3

International Journal of Judicial Law

ISSN: (Print) | 2583-6536 (Online) | Impact Factor: 8.09 | Open Access

The Role of the Peace Acts after Dissolution Limited Liability Company

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Abstract

Study This aims To analyze the role of deed peace post-dissolution of a Limited Liability Company, abbreviated as PT, and the legal consequences and distribution of assets carried out by the liquidator after the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company with a peace deed. The research used is normative legal research. The study results indicate a role for a peace deed after the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company, which has several strategic roles in the dissolution of a PT. First, this deed resolves disputes between shareholders, directors, commissioners, and third parties such as creditors and business partners. When an internal conflict occurs that causes the company to be unable to operate effectively, a peace deed can be used to regulate each party's responsibilities, asset distribution, debt settlement, and termination of employment. Second, a peace deed can help accelerate the liquidation process by providing legal certainty regarding the settlement of the company's obligations to external parties. In contrast, in terms of legality, a peace deed offers legal protection for the parties involved in the dissolution. The agreements stipulated in this deed are final and binding, so No can be canceled in a way that is unilateral by the party. In dispute resolution, a peace deed also reduces the possibility of new lawsuits after the dissolution process is complete because all rights and obligations have been regulated in the agreement.

How to Cite This Article

Nini Angraini, H Zainal Asikin, Wira Pria Suhartana (2025). The Role of the Peace Acts after Dissolution Limited Liability Company . International Journal of Judicial Law (IJJL), 4(3), 88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/IJJL.2025.4.3.88-94

Share This Article: