Abstract

This study has the urgency to normatively analyze the possibility of legal harmonization efforts on Indonesia's petty corruption, it is the implementation of Indonesian extortion. In addition to applying existing laws so far without clarity on eradicating petty corruption that will harm the community closely related. This research uses normative legal research, applying existing legislation to test its suitability. The legal theories used are the theory of legal objectives and the principle of preference to explain the argumentation from the description of the legal issues discussed. The core things that are being troubled in this article are condition there is disharmony in the Corruption Eradication Law, the Presidential Regulation on the Establishment of the Pungli Task Force, and the Attorney General's SEJA which supports restorative justice. Therefore, to carried out the research would bean important matter. Thesolution offered is harmonizing these three regulations and enacting them into laws and regulations. Thus, the protection of the public from extraordinary crimes can be implemented, preventing the omission of acts of corruption, and forming better laws than before in Indonesia.