Abstract

There are often defaults by contractors in construction service contracts that cause losses for service users and the implementation of existing legal accountability mechanisms has not been optimal. The formulation of the problem is: 1). What is the form of default committed by the contractor in the construction service contract; 2). Dispute resolution mechanism arising from contractor default in construction service contracts. The research method used is a normative legal research type with a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that contractor defaults in construction service contracts can be in the form of delays, quality mismatches, administrative negligence to safety violations, so a multi-layered dispute resolution mechanism is needed to ensure legal certainty and justice for the parties.